Subscribe to SearchDay, our free daily e-mail summarizing the day's Search Marketing News.

« China Real Estate Search Engine Launches in English Before Beijing Olympics | Main | SEW Experts: Microsoft Search CashBack: Stealing from Google? »

May 28, 2008

Matt Cutts: Can You Help A Brother Get A Lap Dance?

Figured the title would get Matt's attention. Okay Matt I need some help. I have been hired by an adult entertainment site to build their presence online - get better rankings etc.

I need to build their inbound links and want to make sure I am not wasting my time and their money. So before I started I did a search for your comments on directory submissions, paid links (well everyone knows that opinion), reciprocal links, bad neighborhoods (of the IP kind - not the seedy parts of towns where my client's businesses are located) and your example site review post.

So I began to think that I may not be able to do much for them. In general adult content has a bad rap in our industry - the job no one wants to take on for fear of the association - but it is also the industry that has been 'gaming' the system for the longest and thus most neighborhoods have been marked bad.

What's a guy to do Matt?

Directory listings seem to be one way. But how do we really know which ones are still considered any good and are the adult areas of some of the bigger directories taken with a TON of salt?

Could Google set up a Monitored By Google program? Why not give a Good Search Keeping Seal of Approval? Since directories should be an important part of deeper search results, if there was a system or established list maybe the work on one end could help in other areas of the fight against spam.

I know I am going to hear: "Google does not want to classify good and bad" or some variation of that, but we are being told to use no follow - so maybe other rules and system checks could help this.

Given the basis of the Google algorithm is link based and your job is to fight back the constant spamming, some sort of system could help people.

Interestingly, as I did my searches I did find a lot of people using your name to promote themselves, the one by submit edge is particularly good. They are 2 and 3 for Matt Cutts Directory Submissions and offer to get you in to hundreds of directories for a fee. Despite their SEO efforts I am thinking they may not be a good investment.

There are millions of directories, hell I started dozens back in the day. But if you are going to push your way up the rankings you need links.

I want to do it the right way, so am reaching out to you Matt for some advice. I could do a hoax press release about some gossipy fake story - hey include a porn star and a search industry leader (Danny smart move introducing me to your wife now I can't use you) and I will get a lot of links.

I have read your advice to use common sense when looking at directories but unless I am building the ultimate "good directory list" it is an endless job and one that is still subjective.

Hell, I am sure the people below still do not share the views they once stated:

Rand may not still think:


What does suck, imo, is that Google doesn't want to recognize more legitimate sources of paid links - I'm not talking about link brokers, but about sponsored links on particular sites or in directories, etc.

The belief that a link should not be counted as a vote if someone paid for it is a very dangerous idea. Imagine the link structure of the web without the influence of paid or monetarily influenced links. It would be a very, very different environment and I wonder if Google really believes it would be a better one. It's particularly egregious since their business model is serving links to paid sponsors, but they don't want folks doing it on their blogs or sites unless they add "nofollow" and remove some of the value of that link... Seems highly hypocritical to me.

Jill Whallen:

Come to think of it, it's just not fair that Google doesn't want to count my link farm links as links. Google sucks and so does Matt Cutts.

Okay that one was a joke - don't shoot me Jill.

Time has changed what w do. Would love some insight into where directories stand now as a link building tool.

Posted by Frank Watson on May 28, 2008 3:34 PM

  • Stumble It
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Tweet it on Twitter


Comments

This is the funniest post on directory links I have ever read!

Link building, adult site or no, is very ambiguous, monotonous and time consuming. It's be great if we were "thrown a bone".

Anonymous  May 28, 2008 9:03 PM

There are still valuable directories - use them for certain searches before an engine.

AussieWebmaster  May 28, 2008 9:36 PM

LOVE the column, and I think your idea (and your title) are things that I would not only do myself, I'm a bit worried you've been reading my notes... Awesome.

Judd Exley  May 28, 2008 9:49 PM

Hey Frank, I wouldn't put on blinders thinking about only directories.

Some suggestions for white-hat ways to gather links in the porn space? I'd think about people like Luke Ford, Violet Blue, Tony Comstock, etc. I would also go meta and talk about the porn industry a little bit. Do a little original research. Where does the money in the porn industry go to? How much is affiliate, what % of stuff is PPI, TGP, MGP, etc. What are 15 facts about the porn industry that people didn't know before?

Matt Cutts  May 28, 2008 11:04 PM

Wow, Cutts knows his porn.

You go boy!

Streko  May 29, 2008 2:01 PM

Try using the viral video route. Contract Matt Cutts into making some sort of sexually related video.

> Maybe at a local strip bar getting a lap dance?

> Or maybe have someone from Yahoo or MSN give Matt a lap dance (lots of subliminal angles there).

> How about this subliminal adult thought, show one of Matt's videos where his cat is in his lap. ???

Ron Wicker  May 29, 2008 2:24 PM

Ok. So I'm about as not Matt Cutts as you can get. But I thought about this article a bit, and thought I'd chime in with what I'd do if I had a whitehat firmly grafted to my forehead.
First of all, embrace porn 2.0. Redtube, youporn, pornotube, megarotic, these sites get incredible traffic. Watermark videos and upload them. Beyond that, many give a backlink for it. Also many sites embed these videos, and will give a backlink that way. And even if they don't, they'll drive link juice back to your page ON those porn2.0 sites, and from there into your site.
After that, expand out into sites like freeones.com and porneskimo.com that list and link to free movie/picture previews. All these should obviously be hosted on your primary domain, and passing juice back to the main domain.
Then go after the sites like rabbitsreviews.com that are respected and offer reviews of the various pay porn sites out there. The worst most will ask for is a reciprocal link which shouldn't be a problem considering it's not an excessive amount.
Alright. So after that, it's all about the blogging. I would launch 2 separate blogs. 1 that posts previews of videos and whatnot, and can be used to submit trackbacks to other porn blogs that have posted videos of the same pornstar that's in the video you're posting about. People DO actually subscribe to these blogs as well.
The second blog would be one used primarily for link bait. It may be a good idea to have this one on a separate domain without the same kind of pornographic content as the real one to make it more digg/reddit/whatever friendly.
In addition, there's many pligg(digg clone) installations out there for adult videos. ("powered by pligg" porn movie returns almost 23,000 results on Google)

At that point, launch an affiliate program. Host galleries for the affiliates on the base domain you're using, and once again pass link juice back to the home page. To get around duplicate content issues, have it drop a cookie upon entering the affiliate gallery, then do a 302 redirect to the same page, but without the affiliate ID present. Have a different description of the video for each gallery. Right there, you'll have a bunch of affiliates linking into your site, and all the juice passing properly with no duplicate content issues. Oh yeah, and host the videos themselves on a separate server to make sure you don't slow down your main one.

There. The whitehat porno empire. Erm. I think it's whitehat.

SlightlyShadySEO  May 29, 2008 4:49 PM

Thanks for the input Matt.... I like the idea of articles about the industry few people know

AussieWebmaster  May 30, 2008 1:40 PM

First I share your dilemma on choosing what is a good directory; but, I think basic common sense by and large points me to those that help my clients.

Now for what caught me to post. I've been to several major SEO events. I've been very impressed with where the industry has come to in the last 10 years.

I am tired of the male oriented, in poor taste jokes that prevail. Yes I'm female and a joke here and there isn't a big deal. You should hear us at home and in the office.

Still on the other hand - guys you are not the only ones in the SEO area. Maybe a few of you could tone it down a bit. I'm not hearing racial slurs so maybe a few less jokes along these lines would make this a bit more palatable for the other half.

OKWebmaster  June 3, 2008 8:06 AM

I'll disagree with the bad reputation of the adult industry. Fact is unless you have a decent background in the field it will be harder than most markets to compete.

Climaxgirl  July 27, 2008 1:37 PM

ClimaxGirl - great screenname - I agree the adult space is still one of the most competitive around... learned from it in such scope that doing the same in other industries is nearly imrpossible

AussieWebmaster  July 27, 2008 5:20 PM

@Climaxgirl: Agreed 101% I would say that as an SEO if you can crack the adult industry it's on a par with winning the world cup. IMO it is the industry that has pretty much created the internet and in doing so is the most competitive market (must be closely followed by online casinos these days).

I keep trying to get my boss to do an adult site as a pinnacle project. Who knows, someday we might...

Robert  August 14, 2008 7:51 AM

interesting article.

It's been a while since this was posted... I wonder how everything worked out.

For myself, I don't view marketing adult very differently from marketing mainstream. There are plenty of sources for linking and while it is sometimes harder to squeak in adult related sites I still find the the field wide open with opportunities.

The only problem I see with marketing adult vs. mainstream is it's a narrow field. Unless your chasing after long-tail keywords there are only so many primary keywords available unlike mainstream where there are far more keywords, niches and topics to chase.

girls in bondage  November 7, 2009 7:17 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)